There are many negatives for melee nevermind using knives and similar weaponary but what are the positives, tactics and procedures when using a combat knife?
It is a very basic survival tool and you just have to remember that it's not always aimed at stealth but for self-defence when it's a last resort; say too close to a combatant and you cannot reload or you are jammed. When you have lost your firearm or raising the alarm would be too heavy a cost - this accounts for knives, bayonets, hand-to-hand and whatever else could be used. It was also easily concealed and easily accessable compared with other weaponary.
It is possible to kill, paralyze, and seriously injure. We have projectiles now but they are very similar - sharp objects made to penetrate human flesh and cause as much damage as possible. The only difference now is we shoot them out of a barrel instead of thrusting them into somebody.
It was taught heavily in WW2 and WW1 for getting rid of sentries or within close quarter battle and there are quite a few stories of where it did work - and I agree quite a few where it didn't. They did not teach any techniques that were unproven though.
What thoughts do you guys have? It isn't considered in LE but it is in the military and some close quarter scenarios. In linking it with LE you could swap it around and the knife being used against you.

"Well, that's a great idea. If you're operating single firearm, as most LE/PO's do then a problem with losing the operatability of that is a large risk. No ammunition, a jam, it breaks, it's too close and turns into a grab. You need to learn your anti-grab drills. If you operate with helmets for example learn anti-helmet grab drills. The same goes with transition, or as some like to call it the combatives transition. I think that would be a great combined course with that kind of course content that is very important. Germany's MEK/SEK use co-holsters with a fixed blade and pistol for their transition optionality."




