Working with your team vs working with strangers

Moderator: jimothy_183

Post Reply
User avatar
Ryan
Posts: 2787
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 3:10 am
Contact:

Working with your team vs working with strangers

Post by Ryan » Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:55 am

Thoughts? Especially when it comes to joint-operations and exercises.
CQB-TEAM Education and Motivation.

"Pragmatism over theory."
"Anyone with a weapon is just as deadly as the next person."
"Unopposed CQB is always a success, if you wanted you could moonwalk into the room holding a Pepsi."

User avatar
jimothy_183
Military
Posts: 1024
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2008 7:55 am
Location: Australia

Re: Working with your team vs working with strangers

Post by jimothy_183 » Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:04 pm

http://www.warriortalknews.com/2012/11/team-tactics-in-kingman.html wrote:When you’re operating by yourself, tactical communication isn’t really an issue (if you have communication problems when you’re the only one there, consult a psychologist). Introduce another person, and all of a sudden things get a lot more complicated. Two people acting together without good communication or coordination can be less effective than a single person acting alone, because they get in each other’s way. We need some communications.

The first level of communication happens long before the fight: the SOP. Having a set of standard operating procedures, preplanned and practiced responses for different situations, is far more effective than trying to work everything out in the moment. A really well trained and practiced team can work through even very complex problems without any verbal communications or even hand signals, just based on SOPs and keying off what their teammates are doing. Conversely a scratch team that’s never worked together before, even if the individual operators are very skilled, is going to require a lot more on the spot communication to keep everyone coordinated.

On a verbal level, we have a very simple set of commands that covers the most common eventualities in a team tactics setting. First, what if one team member runs out of ammo or encounters a malfunction? It’s very important to let your teammate know this, so they don’t do anything expecting you will be supplying covering fire. If we yell “I’m out of ammo” or “reloading” or anything similar, we may clue in our enemy that now would be a good time to make their move, since one of our guns is down. Instead, we use “Checking!” to indicate that we’ve got a problem and can’t supply covering fire at the moment. In response, our teammate yells “Covering!” indicating that they’re providing covering fire while we fix our problem.

...

Saturday

We started off the second day with some hand signals. Thus far we’d been relying primarily on verbal communication, backed up by seeing (and in the case of gunfire, hearing) that your team member was doing what he was supposed to. Hand signals can be very useful when you want to be sneaky and quiet. They can also come in quite handy as an adjunct to verbal communication once the fight starts and gunfire is drowning out anything anyone says.

For a permanent team that trains a lot, you can set up all sorts of complicated hand signals, but for a scratch team like we were working with in this class, simpler is better. Point at a guy and then point to a spot and it’s pretty clear the team leader wants him there. Thumbs up means you’re good. Point to your eyes and point to a spot and you want team members to direct their attention (and rifles) to that spot. We leavened these with a smattering of more specialized signals for halt, freeze, rally point, and enemy.
semper acer , semper velox , semper trux , semper promptus

User avatar
tacticalguy
Posts: 689
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 4:48 pm
Location: South Florida

Re: Working with your team vs working with strangers

Post by tacticalguy » Thu Nov 15, 2012 3:15 am

Done the joint exercise thing, many times. The way it works best is when you do an unloaded weapon walk-through, several times, a day or two ahead of time to work out the kinks.
If you have `cleared' all the rooms and met no resistance, you and your entry team have probably kicked in the door of the wrong house.
(Murphy's Cop Laws)

The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan. (Von Clausewitz)

Post Reply

Return to “CQB Team TTP/S”